dull vs lector

dull

verb
  • To render dim or obscure; to sully; to tarnish. 

  • To render dull; to remove or blunt an edge or something that was sharp. 

  • To soften, moderate or blunt; to make dull, stupid, or sluggish; to stupefy. 

  • To lose a sharp edge; to become dull. 

adj
  • Not bright or intelligent; stupid; having slow understanding. 

  • Insensible; unfeeling. 

  • Not intense; felt indistinctly or only slightly. 

  • Sluggish, listless. 

  • Boring; not exciting or interesting. 

  • Not shiny; having a matte finish or no particular luster or brightness. 

  • Lacking the ability to cut easily; not sharp. 

  • Cloudy, overcast. 

  • Heavy; lifeless; inert. 

  • Not clear, muffled. 

lector

verb
  • To do a voice-over translation of a film. 

noun
  • A public lecturer or reader at some universities. 

  • A person doing voice-over translation of foreign films, especially in Eastern European countries. 

  • A lay person who reads aloud certain religious texts in a church service. 

  • A person who reads aloud to workers to entertain them, appointed by a trade union. 

How often have the words dull and lector occurred in a corpus of books? (source: Google Ngram Viewer )